Liability for environmental crimes in the non bis in idem principle context

In light of the social need for humanization criminal policy, annually confirmed by supreme authorities state, specialized literature has updated topic related to prohibition double jeopardy (it protects against a second prosecution same offense after acquittal, conviction and multiple punishments offense). This issue is analyzed researchers in context «non bis idem» principle, which received regulation both norms national international law. An analysis law enforcement practice judiciary considering cases on fact violation public relations field environmental protection (Chapter 26 Criminal Code Russian Federation) indicates permissibility double, some triple, intersectoral liability perpetrator crimes. It seems that legitimacy possibility deprivation legal restrictions relation citizens have been found guilty committing crime who served sentence imposed court full does not correspond principle “non idem”, actualizes chosen research topic.